I like the idea of a superhero who helps out but doesn't really care about others. Hancock saves people and stops disasters, but he doesn't make it nice and tidy. He wrecks buildings and he causes traffic jams. It's a nice change from Superman creating fine-tuned order out of chaos. (Watch the scene in Superman Returns where Superman zips around Metropolis during the earthquake, blasting broken glass with his heat vision and catching falling parts of buildings before they hit the pedestrians on the street below. It's cool and only Superman could pull that off, but it's too neat.) Granted, we don't know why Hancock even bothers, but it's nice to see a super-powered person who gets his hands dirty.
The movie could have stayed on that thread--a superhero who needs to reinvent his image, who needs to have a better reputation with the public and answer to the damages he causes. It's similar to that guy suing Mr. Incredible for saving him when he didn't want to be saved. It can be comical and it's different. It makes you think about how superheroes would function in the real world. Will Smith could have easily pulled that off, but even he couldn't make the rest of Hancock entertaining.
It should have ended with the new and improved Hancock, polite and available to lend a helping hand in his spiffy suit. The movie drags on though. The lame mythos, the soap-opera side-plot between Hancock and Mary (lost lovers with a dash of amnesia mixed in) and the forced sacrifices the characters have to make feel like excuses to have a few fight scenes and blood.
Hancock deserves some credit for a different take on superhero movies, but the last third of the movie should have been cut.
Technorati Tags: Hancock
No comments:
Post a Comment