Showing posts with label Continuum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Continuum. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

How does time travel work in Continuum?

Continuum hasn't defined its rules for time travel. On the one hand, no set rules means that the show can put things into place as needed and as the story progresses. But on the other hand, the audience doesn't know what is at stake for the characters if we aren't sure how their actions affect the future (or the past).

What we can do is look at possible time travel theories based on what happened in the show so far. My go-to process with new time travel stories is to figure them out by using older stories where we know how time travel works.

Spoilers below through episode 2.08 "Second Listen."

(source)

Theory 1

The future already happened


In season one of Heroes, Peter Petrelli has visions of the future, and he knows those events are going to happen. He isn't able to change them. The only thing he can do is figure out how he is going to react.

If the same is true for Continuum, then all the scenes in the future will happen (have already happened). Everything we see Alec do in the future is already in place, such as making sure Kiera is the CPS officer sent back with the Liber8 group and sending back Garza as his judge and jury. (We see the scenes from the future as they are relevant to what is happening in the present.) The characters in the present cannot affect the future we've already seen in 2077 and Future Alec's intervention with the past is pointless. Maybe he hasn't realized that yet.

Theory 2

Nothing is set in stone


In The Terminator movies, John Connor's ultimate goal is to prevent the machines from taking over humanity. Future John sends Kyle Reese (in the first movie) and a terminator (in the second movie) back in time to help his mother and his younger self. John alters events in the past and keeps delaying the machines' rise to power in the future. The changes oscillate back and forth. Future John sends someone back in time. The characters in the present time make changes, which affect things in the future. Then Future John sends someone (or something) else back to make more changes.

If the same flexibility works in Continuum, then Kiera and Alec make changes in the present that will change the future, and Future Alec is responding to those changes and sending back messages or people to keep altering things to the way he wants them to be. This means that the scenes we see in the future are actually happening in alternate futures. Future Alec sends Liber8 back in time. They make changes. He responds by making sure that Kiera is sent back with them. She makes changes. He makes sure that his younger self doesn't make bad decisions by sending Garza. The characters can make changes and respond to effects all the time, back and forth, in both the present and the future. 

Theory 3

The timeline split


In Back to the Future II, Biff creates an alternate timeline when he visits his younger self in 1955 and gives him a sports almanac to bet on winning teams and raise a fortune in Hill Valley. By 1985 (the movie's present time), Hill Valley is completely altered from the original timeline that we saw in Back to the Future I. The only way to return to the original timeline is for Marty to travel to 1955 and stop Biff from meeting his younger self.

An alternate timeline in Continuum means that Kiera, Alec, and Liber8 have made enough changes that the future changes. Kiera cannot go back to the 2077 she knew unless she can travel back to the day she arrived in 2012 and stop her past self and Liber8 from making any changes. (She would probably have to kill them, including her past self.) As for the show's scenes in the future, there are two possibilities: 1) The future we see is from the original 2077 or 2) The future we see is from the alternate timeline and Alec is still trying to make changes to the past.

Any of these theories could help explain how time travel works in Continuum, but I have a feeling the show is going to leave the rules undefined. If the characters don't know what they can change, then maybe the audience shouldn't know either.

Monday, June 17, 2013

Continuum: What's Alec doing?

I watched season 1 of Continuum this week and before I start on season 2, I want to write down my thoughts about what Future Alec is up to.

The two main questions are:

1. Is Future Alec good or bad?
2. What is Kiera's role?

If Future Alec is good then maybe...

a) Alec intended to improve the world with his technology but instead the government and corporations abused his technology and the power it afforded them. Future Alec sends back the group to change the course of his younger self and create a better future.

b) Alec is going to make major changes in the future, but he needs different circumstances to work with. He sent back Liber8 to set up specific events in the past that are part of Alec's plans in the future.

If Future Alec is bad then maybe...

Things happened exactly the way Future Alec wanted. Liber8's actions in the past lead to the conditions we already see in the future. (Everything already happened, so Future Alec is simply going through the motions.)

It doesn't make sense for Future Alec to send both the Liber8 group and Kiera back in time for the same purpose. He would have known that Kiera, as a CPS officer, would interfere with Liber8's plans (which are Future Alec's plans). If Kiera is not going to help Liber8, then she must have a different role. These are the possibilities I came up with:

- protect young Alec, like Kyle Reese going back in time to protect Sarah Connor
- change the views of young Alec (make him re-think what it's like to rely on technology all the time) 
- kill young Alec before he develops the tech we see in the future. I see this happening only if Future Alec thought there was no way to change the future unless he died in the past.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

It's a flashback for her, not us

I watched season 1 of Continuum over the past few days, and I'm having a terminology issue. We see scenes of Kiera as a police officer in the year 2077. These scenes are her memories, so they are flashbacks for her. But from the audience's point of view, these scenes take place about 65 years in the future.

Do we still call these scenes flashbacks since the show is from Kiera's point of view? Or is there a better word?

Friday, June 14, 2013

Take away the suit

I started watching season 1 of Continuum and the fourth episode, "Matter of Time," used one of my favorite television tropes: taking away the superhero's power and seeing what she is like without it.

The main character, Kiera Cameron, is not superhuman but she has a technologically-advanced suit that gives her an advantage over ordinary police officers. She uses the suit to run scans, look up information, and protect her from harm.

In scenes that take place in the future, the audience sees that police officers rely on technology to do their work. Optical cameras record everything the officer sees and the suit offers a variety of tools to fight crime. The police officers actually learn to repress their instincts and gut feelings in favor of gathering information through their enhanced suits.

Kiera operates in the same way when she travels back to 2012, but in "Matter of Time," her suit shorts out, and she loses access to the suit's capabilities. She tries interrogating a suspect and walking through a crime scene without her technological enhancements and finds that she likes doing the work that way. She says it "feels good" to act on her hunches and listen to her instincts.

Taking the suit away gave her the opportunity to see that she can be a police officer without the advanced technology (which is her superpower). She learns to adapt and becomes confident in her skills as an officer. The character learns about herself and the audience gets to see great character development.