Sunday, December 28, 2014

Work culture, blogging, and workflows


Here's the last Weekend Roundup for 2014. (If you'd like to look at past roundups, check the tag.)

A long read, but good: How the Death of Mid-Budget Cinema Left a Generation of Iconic Filmmakers MIA (FlavorWire)

Lifehacker interviews people about how they work, their schedules, and what tools they use. I love these articles: I'm Ira Glass, Host of This American Life, and This Is How I Work

Two things I have tried but failed to explain successfully at work, and Fast Company covers them both nicely:

A good set of rules to keep in mind from email, since many of us have to deal with it everyday: EMAIL CHARTER

Some blogging and graphic design resources: 
Photo credit: christmas holly fir tree decoration by markus spiske is licensed under CC by 2.0. Modifications: added text, adjusted colors.

Saturday, December 20, 2014

Sunday, November 30, 2014

Plain text, email, and newsletters


When I have too many browser tabs open, it's because of stuff like this:

These two rules for reading make me feel better about the stack of unread books on my shelf. (Thought Catalog, via Austin Kleon)

I started keeping a commonplace book, Ryan Holiday style. (Thought Catalog)

I love using plain text files, and this is why. (Lifehacker)

Why e-mail newsletters made a comeback (The Globe and Mail)

[Okay, so I spiraled through a bunch of articles on email and newsletters and kept the best.]

Tips On Crafting A Popular Newsletter, From Top Newsletter Authors (Fast Company)

Inside The Company That Got Rid Of Email (Well, almost.) - Fast Company

Tiny Letters to the Web We Miss (Medium)

Why Everyone Is Obsessed With E-Mail Newsletters Right Now (Tech Crunch)

Email Is Still the Best Thing on the Internet (but people don't believe me when I say so) (The Atlantic)

Photo credit: markus spiske via photopin cc. Modifications: added text, adjusted colors.

Friday, November 28, 2014

Bits of Black Hat


Chuck Klosterman writes a lot of cultural essays, and I find myself underlining a lot of stuff in his books. Here are some of my favorite bits from I Wear the Black Hat.

 His basic definition of a villain:


On the relationship between knowing and caring:
"If a villain is the person who knows the most and cares the least, then a hero is the person who cares too much without knowing anything. It makes every hero seems like Forrest Gump. But it's not the intelligence that people dislike; it's the dispassionate application of that intelligence. It's the calculation. It's someone who views life as a game where the rules are poorly written and designed for abuse."

"I am a bad guy because I remember it (and because it informs how I think about everything else). I know it's wrong and I do it anyway. I do it consciously. I have the ability to think about this person in a thousand different contexts, yet I prefer keeping my mind unchanged. I can see every alternate reality, but I prefer to arbitrarily create my own. I know the truth, but I just don't care."
On vigilantes and specifically Batman:
"When considering the vigilante, the way we think about fiction contradicts how we feel about reality. Which should not be unanticipated or confusing, yet somehow always is."

"Yet Batman never tries to overcome this childhood event. It becomes the only meaningful moment of his entire history, and he doesn't seem to question why this is the case. 'I think the refusal to examine the insanity of what he's doing is the whole point of Batman,' argues culture writer Alex Pappadamas, paraphrasing the sentiments of Batman screenwriter Sam Hamm. 'He's a rich solipsist who can never beat up enough muggers to bring his dead parents back. But because he's a billionaire, he can afford to keep trying forever. He's never confronted with the futility of what he's doing. Were he to examine and work past those motivations, you'd have no story. The guy has to stay broken.'"

"Batman is not a superhero because of his physical abilities and mental acuities; Batman is a superhero because he seems like a moral impossibility. No one believes a real human would live that far outside the law for the good of other people."
On Seinfeld and satire:
"Most episosdes of Seinfeld circuitously forward two worldviews: The first is that most people are bad (and not very smart). The second is that caring about other people is absurd (and not very practical)."

"If you want to satirize the condition of a society, going after the apex of the pyramid is a waste of time. You need to attack the bottom. [...] This requires the vilification of innocent, anonymous, working-class people."

Sunday, November 2, 2014

Work culture, optical illusions, and a word game


My browser tabs have been full of these things lately:

What Successful People Do During Lunch (Fast Company)

How To Create A Culture Of Productivity (Fast Company)

How to run a brainstorm for introverts (and extroverts too) (TED Blog)

Foxhole Fiver w/ James Pianka (The Meeple Mechanic)

Roots on Kickstarter - a game of inventing words

"The Writing's On the Wall" by OK Go - I've been obsessing over this song and video.


Image credit: Pumpkin Pile by arbyreed via photopin cc

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Day One backs up my brain


I started using Day One a few months ago, but not for journaling. Going by the reviews in the App Store, most people do that. They use Day One as a diary or maybe as a travel journal.

I've been using Day One to write about stuff that I’m reading and watching, and it has been working really well.

Before Day One, I kept a handwritten journal to record my thoughts and ideas related to TV shows, movies, and novels. Positive or negative reactions, why something does (or doesn’t) keep my interest. It's the Media Studies major in me—I can't help it.

I started recording those kinds of thoughts last year after I read Moonwalking with Einstein by Joshua Foer. He references Michel de Montaigne, who wrote “a short critical judgment” in the back of every book he read so later he could reference what the book was about and what he thought of it. He didn't have to depend on his memory to keep track of everything he read.

I liked that idea, and it works well enough for books, but sometimes I give mine away. Sometimes I borrow books from friends or read e-books, and I can't write in those. I wanted to record my reactions to TV shows and movies too, so I starting writing all of those thoughts in a notebook. Entries in a physical notebook have limitations, though, and I’ve found that Day One remedies all of them.

1. My handwriting gets messy, especially when I’m trying to get my thoughts down quickly. On the plus side, I’m used to my messy writing so I can still read it, but it’s still sloppy on the page. Not really something that’s easy to reference afterwards. I type in Day One. Effortless neatness.

2. I like going back to add things. Writing entries back-to-back in a physical notebook doesn’t allow me to go back and add thoughts, like after the second time I watch a movie. Leaving some blank space between entries doesn’t work well either, because that’s wasted space if I never go back to it. I can edit entries in Day One, even re-write them if I want to, without affecting the rest of the entries.

3. Physical notebooks can be difficult to navigate (unless I make some kind of index). Day One is searchable, and you can tag entries. It’s easy to look for something I wrote before. It’s easy to find related entries.

4. I can’t easily back up a physical notebook. (Photocopying every page is probably my best option.) Day One lets me export my entries as PDFs, so I create back up copies periodically to make sure I don’t lose my writing.

Day One has an easy-to-use, simple interface. It stays out of your way so you can write.

Photo credit: Livro ou TV? by Lubs Mary. via photopin cc

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Renewable footsteps, bullet journal, and a list of apps

 

Here are some things I've been reading lately that I think are worth sharing:

“How I Work”: Ann Handley, Founder/Chief Content Officer, MarketingProfs (Heinz Marketing)

25+ apps to make your everyday life easier (TED Blog)

#firstlinelastline: Mashup the first line of a novel with the last line of another (Austin Kleon)

You Had A Major And Minor In College—Why Not At Work? (Fast Company)

Bullet Journal // Organisation & Planning (BookParty! on YouTube)

The Lights On This Soccer Field Are Powered As Players Run (Fast.Co Exist)

Did you come across an interesting article this week? Link me to it.

Image source: Saturday Morning Café (Cappuccino) by Frank Weber is licensed under CC BY 2.0. (Modifications to image as it appears in this post: cropped, adjusted colors and brightness, and added text.)

Sunday, October 5, 2014

Doctor Who: "Kill the Moon" was really good

I think "Kill the Moon" is the best episode of season 8 so far and this is why:

(Beware spoilers.)

1. Twelve did what the Doctor does best: help people be better versions of themselves.
Courtney now has a reason to believe she is special, and it's not just because the Doctor says so. Clara saves the planet and that's to her credit, because the Doctor wasn't around to lead or influence her.

2. Clara is better when she actually has stuff to do.
I like Jenna Coleman (where did the Louise go?), but until the last few episodes, she was kind of stuck in a rut. Clara gets repetitive making and cancelling plans with Danny. She follows the Doctor and acts as his moral compass, again and again. There isn't necessarily anything wrong with any of that, but for a while Clara felt stagnant. But tonight? We got to see her comfort Courtney. She had to explain human things to the Doctor, like why a young girl would feel scared when there are monsters on the moon. Clara was scared. Clara was angry. And it was great to watch.

3. Twelve keeps saying he is an alien.
I love that he made humans decide what to do about the moon. He isn't human, so it wasn't his place to decide. Clara depends on the Doctor too much, and he made it clear that sometimes he shouldn't get involved. He distances himself and it feels very Doctory. None of this trying to blend in with humans and needing them to accept him.

4. The yo-yo.
Such a simple way to test the gravity on the moon, and it's so much better than some bogus gadget that might have been in a different space show. The Doctor makes use of what he has and makes it work. I like that Twelve doesn't over-complicate things.

What did you think of the episode? Let me know.

Friday, October 3, 2014

The right book exactly, at exactly the right time

Last week, I wrote this on my other blog:
Ever have a TV show, movie, or book come into your life at exactly the right time? You experience the thing exactly when you need to and you slip back into a groove (when you didn’t even realize you had slipped out), and everything flows. Pieces click into place and everything feels right.

I don’t know how, but this work happens all by itself.

I was talking about Haven, which I have been catching up on and obsessing over, thanks to Netflix and a talented group of actors, writers, and everyone else who works on the show. But that bit of writing was also a reaction to Mr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore, which found me at about the same time as Haven.

Tonight I finished Penumbra. Check out the final paragraph:
The final line?

I never skip ahead in books, so tonight was the first time I turned to that page.

Whoa.

Thursday, September 4, 2014

The scariest thing about Kate Argent

(Spoilers for 4.11 "A Promise to the Dead")
A few things are unsettling about Kate Argent this season—her were-jaguar abilities, the Berserkers she controls, whatever she did to Derek—but the scariest thing she has done so far is turn Scott into a Berserker.

The scary part isn't that Kate turns Scott into a monster. We could say that Scott was physically a monster already, even if he chose not to hurt people with his werewolf abilities. The scary part is that Kate turns Scott into the polar opposite of what he wants to be. She shatters the heroic part of him, everything he has worked for and fought for, and she is calm about it, calculating. That gave me chills.

Worse, earlier in this episode, one of Satomi's werewolves talks to Liam about how amazing Scott is for earning the power to be a True Alpha, for his leadership, for the way he protects his friends. So just in case anyone in the audience hasn't been paying attention, we have these reminders of everything good in Scott McCall. Over four seasons of the show, we have seen Scott:
  • Choose to use his power for good, over and over, even when others try to force him into violent situations.
  • Lead others into action and give them hope, even when the odds are against them
  • Give everyone a choice in getting involved with the supernatural world, and not judge them for choosing safety

Kate inverts all of that.

She forces Scott to become a Berserker and she controls what the Berserkers do. It seems like she will force him to fight his friends in the finale, so she takes away his power to decide what he does with his power and his desire to protect his friends.

The scariest thing is that Kate is able to unmake Scott the Alpha, turn him against his friends, and use him however she wants.

Monday, September 1, 2014

The Greatest American Hero is getting a reboot

The Greatest American Hero is getting a reboot and while I can understand why some people think the concept won't do well in modern times, I think it can work if the reboot sticks to the basic concepts of the original series.

A suit they don't know how to use
The twist in original show was that Ralph lost the instruction book to the suit, so he figured out how to use it by trial and error and, well, accidents. That idea can still work in an updated version—it's not much different from a superhero gaining powers and having to learn how to use them. In the original series, not knowing how to use the suit led to many comedic moments (including the running gag that Ralph couldn't land after flying). The updated series can use that, but not knowing how to use the suit can also lead to dramatic moments where the hero fails.

A government handler and a civilian with the suit
Bill and Ralph were a great team in the original series because they approached problems differently. Bill worked for the FBI and so he wanted procedures and scenarios for every situation. Ralph, a civilian teacher, wanted to help people without it being a big deal. He was even reluctant to get involved in some cases because he wasn't sure he was up to the task. That tension worked really well, both for stories and for character development.

Helping out with everyday problems
One of my favorite parts of the original series was that the crime stopping stayed local (to Los Angeles). The characters didn't face threats against the entire world, and that helped the series stay light. Every day wasn't a doomsday event, and that left opportunities to see who the characters were outside of solving crimes and figuring out the suit.

The reboot could also explore ideas that weren't explored much in the original series, including:
  • Should the hero have an alter ego/secret identity?
  • Are the hero and the FBI agent tempted to use the suit for themselves?
  • Do these characters live in a world with superhero comics (and movies, TV shows), and does that influence what they do with the suit?
I'm interested to see how the reboot develops. With the success of so many superhero movies, I expect people will tune in. Hopefully the cast, writing, and direction of the show will encourage us to stick with it.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Same blog, new domain

Quick note to let you know that the URL for this blog is changing to http://www.mythicaltype.com.

Please update bookmarks. The RSS feed will stay the same. Blog will stay the same. :)

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Give me uncertain heroes

When I watched X-Men: Days of Future Past, I realized that one of my favorite things about these characters is that they are allowed to be imperfect and unfinished. They make poor decisions. They're selfish and stubborn. They lie. But they also change, and we get to see the whole process.

Other superhero movies give us an origin story or a full-blown hero, but not many deal with the hero's uncertainty as the main story. Uncertainty comes as a brief scene or it's used as an excuse to see the hero act out of character. But it's rare that we see uncertainty used for character development and executed well.

Days of Future Past shows us a young Charles who gives up his ability because he doesn't want to cope with other people's pain in his head.

We see a young Magneto who chooses to act in ways that benefit the mutant community as a whole, over and over, even if it means killing a friend (Raven). Nothing is personal with him—it's only mutant or human.

But then we see Charles accept that he needs to open his mind in order to save others, and that allows him to grow into the mentor/leader that is so calm and assertive in the future, even when all odds are against him. We see an older Magneto in the future fight to protect his friends with little concern for himself, even missing a piece of shrapnel that ends up fatally wounding him, because he was more concerned with saving the others.

Besides seeing these characters develop and change over time, I also love that we see them lose control of their abilities or be afraid of what they can do.

Too often in superhero movies, we're given the over-confident hero who always knows what to do. Or at least, he tries his best and gets lucky.

In Days of Future Past, though, the character don't always know what they're doing.

When Magneto is drowning in the fountain, all the cars on the street shift and tilt toward him. It isn't because he was going to use them, but because he was in danger and freaking out—so his powers went haywire.

Charles's abilities go out of control too. When he puts on Cerebro, he says "these are muscles I haven't stretched in a long time," meaning maybe he will have trouble operating Cerebro, but he ends up shorting out the machine. Part of that might have been his nervousness, but it seemed like he underestimated his power and then used too much.

I like watching characters who don't fully know themselves and can't fully control their abilities. It's so much better than a story about a static, finished hero.